(If you are a fan of "Mad Men" but have not seen the show finale, you probably don't want to read any further right now.)
Public administration is considered a social science, so "community" is a common theme in the discipline. As a practitioner, community could be interpreted as narrowly as stakeholders and constituents.
When I think of the textbook definition of community, I think back to the early social studies curricula when I was in elementary school, the textbook cover art lined with people of different ethnicities, ages, genders, and ability, each doing their part to build a "community".
While some standard public administration textbooks do not address the issue of "community", several scholars do pay attention to its centrality in the discipline. For example, Deborah Stone's polis model of society is a policy framework that challenges the "rational model" and relies on the concept of community. She states, "Public policy is about communities trying to achieve something as communities" (p. 18). Richard Box (2009) discusses community in terms of local governance. Finally, Robert D. Putnam devoted an entire book, Bowling Alone, to the decline of community in the United States.
I want to shy away from the textbook definition of community in this particular post and think beyond this concept. I want to consider community in a context that is global and intangible.
In the final episode of "Mad Men" the protagonist and anti-hero, Don Draper, sits meditating by the California coast, seemingly at peace with his past and present, the fate of characters resting in the balance of the future, which is ambiguous and unknown. We do not know if Don or any of the other characters will get a happy ending. The camera zooms in on Don with a blissful smile and then cuts to footage of the 1971 McCann-Erickson Coca-Cola commercial "I'd Like to Buy the World a Coke."
In this last shot, a community of viewers, the audience, collectively sat in an anxious send off, immediately resorting to the internet to share their perceptions of the ending in Tweets, status updates, blogs, and articles.
That is what is so remarkable about the ending, this juxtaposition between what is real, fiction, and nonfiction, creating this blended community. We have the fictional Don Draper, who was never real to begin with, an ad man from a fictional agency bought out by a real-life agency, McCann Erickson, a fictional character who dreamed up (or not) a real-life ad about a global community. The viewing community was able to meet at this apex between real and fiction. Finally, there is the idea that the entire world is just one community bonding over a "real" product.
This leads me to global communities and how we interact. As a researcher who studies comparative administration and policy narratives with a topical area is on another continent, I rely on individuals and communities through technology. Nothing takes the place of on-the-ground field work, but the global community on a digital platform gives me more access to knowledge but also a "real place" to disseminate knowledge. To illustrate, my topic area is Japan, so I rely on communities of scholars, practitioners, and subjects for my research, but it is also necessary to connect with communities on the West Coast and in other places such as Australia and New Zealand, whose scholarship I have found particularly enriching on my subject given their geopolitical interest in Japan. I hope to similarly touch these communities as well with the knowledge I generate but also address a pivotal question in public policy scholarship.
CEnR plays directly into an intriguing question that public policy scholars face:
How is this knowledge disseminated to the community, which includes actors, constituents, and stakeholders.
I want to shy away from the textbook definition of community in this particular post and think beyond this concept. I want to consider community in a context that is global and intangible.
In the final episode of "Mad Men" the protagonist and anti-hero, Don Draper, sits meditating by the California coast, seemingly at peace with his past and present, the fate of characters resting in the balance of the future, which is ambiguous and unknown. We do not know if Don or any of the other characters will get a happy ending. The camera zooms in on Don with a blissful smile and then cuts to footage of the 1971 McCann-Erickson Coca-Cola commercial "I'd Like to Buy the World a Coke."
In this last shot, a community of viewers, the audience, collectively sat in an anxious send off, immediately resorting to the internet to share their perceptions of the ending in Tweets, status updates, blogs, and articles.
That is what is so remarkable about the ending, this juxtaposition between what is real, fiction, and nonfiction, creating this blended community. We have the fictional Don Draper, who was never real to begin with, an ad man from a fictional agency bought out by a real-life agency, McCann Erickson, a fictional character who dreamed up (or not) a real-life ad about a global community. The viewing community was able to meet at this apex between real and fiction. Finally, there is the idea that the entire world is just one community bonding over a "real" product.
This leads me to global communities and how we interact. As a researcher who studies comparative administration and policy narratives with a topical area is on another continent, I rely on individuals and communities through technology. Nothing takes the place of on-the-ground field work, but the global community on a digital platform gives me more access to knowledge but also a "real place" to disseminate knowledge. To illustrate, my topic area is Japan, so I rely on communities of scholars, practitioners, and subjects for my research, but it is also necessary to connect with communities on the West Coast and in other places such as Australia and New Zealand, whose scholarship I have found particularly enriching on my subject given their geopolitical interest in Japan. I hope to similarly touch these communities as well with the knowledge I generate but also address a pivotal question in public policy scholarship.
CEnR plays directly into an intriguing question that public policy scholars face:
How is this knowledge disseminated to the community, which includes actors, constituents, and stakeholders.